DRGVX vs. ACTIX
DRGVX (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I) and ACTIX (Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DRGVX returned 13.43%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for ACTIX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRGVX charges 0.68%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for ACTIX.
Performance
DRGVX vs. ACTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGVX achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly higher than ACTIX's 0.21% return.
DRGVX
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
ACTIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- —
DRGVX vs. ACTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 14.17% | 18.48% | 14.26% | 12.83% | 1.51% | 17.21% |
ACTIX Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 0.21% | 6.08% | 3.07% | 5.97% | -9.94% | 0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGVX and ACTIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRGVX vs. ACTIX — Risk / Return Rank
DRGVX
ACTIX
DRGVX vs. ACTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRGVX | ACTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.23 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | 1.56 | +3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.09 | 5.42 | +11.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRGVX | ACTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.24 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.18 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.22 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
DRGVX vs. ACTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGVX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, which is greater than ACTIX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGVX and ACTIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGVX | ACTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.60% | -14.29% | -28.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.65% | -2.90% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.01% | -3.95% | -13.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.01% | -14.29% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.93% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -5.01% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 0.83% | +0.97% |
Volatility
DRGVX vs. ACTIX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX) at 1.23%. This indicates that DRGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRGVX | ACTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 1.23% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 2.81% | +6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 3.64% | +8.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 4.67% | +10.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 4.61% | +14.22% |
DRGVX vs. ACTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGVX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ACTIX's 2.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRGVX vs. ACTIX - Dividend Comparison
DRGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than ACTIX's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTIX Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 3.08% | 3.09% | 3.18% | 2.44% | 1.10% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 6.03% | 6.88% | 6.87% | 5.31% | 7.99% | 21.73% | 2.85% | 3.52% | 17.87% | 10.95% | 2.89% | 16.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRGVX and ACTIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRGVX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to ACTIX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRGVX dropped -42.60% vs ACTIX's -14.29%.
DRGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRGVX and ACTIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer