DRGN vs. AGIQ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) and AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - DRGN tracks the BITA China Generative AI Select Index while AGIQ tracks the BITA US Agentic AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DRGN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AGIQ.

Performance

DRGN vs. AGIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRGN achieves a 13.71% return, which is significantly higher than AGIQ's 11.81% return.

DRGN

• 1D: 4.60%
• 1M: 4.46%
• 6M: 5.58%
• YTD: 13.71%
• 1Y: 37.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 41.66%

AGIQ

• 1D: 3.55%
• 1M: 4.60%
• 6M: 14.48%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	$100.24K	$102.18K	$184.78K
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	$473.92K	$435.90K	$560.91K

DRGN vs. AGIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	13.71%	-0.18%
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	11.81%	13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DRGN and AGIQ is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

DRGN vs. AGIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRGN

DRGN Risk / Return Rank: 38
DRGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
DRGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DRGN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
DRGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
DRGN Martin Ratio Rank: 34

AGIQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRGN vs. AGIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRGN	AGIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	—	—

Drawdowns

DRGN vs. AGIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRGN drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, which is greater than AGIQ's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN and AGIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRGN	AGIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.86%	-19.72%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.32%	-0.96%	-8.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-6.24%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRGN	AGIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.79%	24.07%	+12.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.16%	24.07%	+12.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.16%	24.07%	+12.09%

DRGN vs. AGIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRGN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AGIQ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRGN vs. AGIQ - Dividend Comparison

DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than AGIQ's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	1.81%	0.38%
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	1.07%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRGN and AGIQ in my portfolio?

DRGN and AGIQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRGN or AGIQ?

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRGN or AGIQ?

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AGIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRGN or AGIQ?

AGIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.07% for DRGN.

What is the main difference between DRGN and AGIQ?

DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index, while AGIQ tracks BITA US Agentic AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DRGN and 0.69% for AGIQ.