PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRESX vs. EMRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRESX vs. EMRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRESX achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than EMRSX's 19.19% return.


DRESX

1D
1.44%
1M
-8.67%
6M
-3.73%
YTD
4.11%
1Y
17.57%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
9.10%
ALL TIME*
7.56%

EMRSX

1D
1.96%
1M
-1.38%
6M
9.68%
YTD
19.19%
1Y
39.21%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DRESX vs. EMRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
4.11%24.08%14.86%10.30%-21.17%15.93%33.56%33.70%-0.83%
EMRSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund
19.19%35.27%6.43%8.91%-21.42%-3.38%18.56%21.40%-1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DRESX and EMRSX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2018

0.78

The correlation between DRESX and EMRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRESX vs. EMRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRESX
DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

EMRSX
EMRSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EMRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRESX vs. EMRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRESXEMRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.66

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

8.47

-5.39

DRESX vs. EMRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRESX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the EMRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRESX and EMRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRESX vs. EMRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRESX drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, smaller than the maximum EMRSX drawdown of -41.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRESX and EMRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRESXEMRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.38%

-41.28%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.40%

-14.14%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-15.42%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-35.79%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.88%

-9.01%

-8.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-15.09%

+5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

4.43%

+1.20%

Volatility

DRESX vs. EMRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) is 7.46%, while JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) has a volatility of 9.82%. This indicates that DRESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRESXEMRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

9.82%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.69%

21.39%

-4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.55%

23.26%

-4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

18.34%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

19.80%

-3.57%

DRESX vs. EMRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRESX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than EMRSX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRESX vs. EMRSX - Dividend Comparison

DRESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than EMRSX's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
2.16%2.25%0.68%1.09%0.00%0.04%0.65%0.41%0.00%
EMRSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund
3.09%3.68%2.42%3.08%2.48%5.59%1.50%0.94%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRESX and EMRSX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMRSX has higher volatility (9.82%) compared to DRESX (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRESX dropped -33.38% vs EMRSX's -41.28%.

EMRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRESX and EMRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer