DRES vs. SPMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. DRES is actively managed, while SPMD is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRES charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPMD.

Performance

DRES vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 20.00% return, which is significantly higher than SPMD's 14.16% return.

DRES

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 20.00%
• 6M: 18.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPMD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 14.41%
• 1Y: 25.49%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: 11.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRES vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	20.00%	2.65%
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF	14.16%	1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DRES and SPMD is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

DRES vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMD

SPMD Risk / Return Rank: 51
SPMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SPMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SPMD Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SPMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SPMD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRES vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRES	SPMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	0.45	+1.55

Drawdowns

DRES vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and SPMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRES	SPMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-57.62%	+47.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.08%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-8.12%	+5.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRES	SPMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.37%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.37%	15.57%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.37%	19.70%	-1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	21.18%	-2.81%

DRES vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRES vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison

DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than SPMD's 1.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.30%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF	1.23%	1.39%	1.42%	1.47%	1.64%	1.24%	1.30%	1.57%	1.85%	1.97%	2.13%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRES and SPMD in my portfolio?

DRES and SPMD have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRES or SPMD?

On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRES or SPMD?

SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRES or SPMD?

SPMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.30% for DRES.

What is the main difference between DRES and SPMD?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 0.05% for SPMD.