DRES vs. MSSS
DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) and MSSS (Monarch Select Subsector ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. DRES is actively managed, while MSSS is passively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DRES charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for MSSS.
Performance
DRES vs. MSSS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 24.62% return, which is significantly higher than MSSS's 20.59% return.
DRES
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- 24.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MSSS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 17.01%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 26.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $79.04K | $72.09K | $66.39K | |
| $454.51K | $492.62K | $419.32K |
DRES vs. MSSS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 24.62% | 2.50% |
MSSS Monarch Select Subsector ETF | 20.59% | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRES and MSSS is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRES vs. MSSS — Risk / Return Rank
DRES
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSSS
DRES vs. MSSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and Monarch Select Subsector ETF (MSSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRES | MSSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRES vs. MSSS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum MSSS drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and MSSS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRES | MSSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -19.14% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.43% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -2.93% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility
DRES vs. MSSS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRES | MSSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 13.12% | +5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 15.82% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 15.82% | +2.30% |
DRES vs. MSSS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MSSS's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRES vs. MSSS - Dividend Comparison
DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than MSSS's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 0.51% | 0.22% | 0.00% |
MSSS Monarch Select Subsector ETF | 0.28% | 0.21% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRES and MSSS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRES is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRES is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.43% for MSSS.
DRES has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.28% for MSSS.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and Monarch. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 1.43% for MSSS.
Find the right allocation for DRES and MSSS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer