PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DREGX vs. FCEEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DREGX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DREGX having a 22.17% return and FCEEX slightly lower at 21.57%.


DREGX

1D
0.05%
1M
-3.74%
6M
14.03%
YTD
22.17%
1Y
40.52%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
10.25%

FCEEX

1D
0.19%
1M
-4.20%
6M
14.85%
YTD
21.57%
1Y
37.62%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DREGX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DREGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund
22.17%29.95%7.40%11.26%-22.54%-1.95%27.36%11.15%
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
21.57%34.81%10.51%12.52%-16.96%-1.29%10.19%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DREGX and FCEEX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.92

The correlation between DREGX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DREGX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DREGX
DREGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DREGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DREGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DREGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DREGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DREGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FCEEX
FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DREGX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DREGXFCEEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.92

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

10.07

+0.14

DREGX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DREGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DREGX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DREGX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DREGX drawdown since its inception was -65.44%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DREGX and FCEEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DREGXFCEEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.44%

-34.68%

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.82%

-12.98%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-15.47%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.41%

-31.37%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.35%

-7.05%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.34%

-11.14%

-6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

3.75%

+0.27%

Volatility

DREGX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) have volatilities of 10.12% and 10.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DREGXFCEEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

10.17%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

19.55%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.51%

21.63%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.09%

17.80%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.99%

18.86%

+0.13%

DREGX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DREGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

DREGX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

DREGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than FCEEX's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DREGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund
1.39%1.69%0.89%1.81%0.75%16.71%2.48%0.82%4.33%0.59%
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
2.42%3.29%4.17%4.36%4.08%3.38%2.98%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DREGX and FCEEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCEEX has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to DREGX (10.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DREGX dropped -65.44% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

DREGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DREGX and FCEEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer