PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DREGX vs. DSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DREGX vs. DSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) and Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (DSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DREGX achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly higher than DSMDX's 8.67% return.


DREGX

1D
4.17%
1M
-5.24%
6M
6.56%
YTD
16.77%
1Y
37.08%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
10.42%

DSMDX

1D
2.61%
1M
-6.93%
6M
1.22%
YTD
8.67%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DREGX vs. DSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DREGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund
16.77%29.95%7.40%11.26%-22.54%-1.95%47.77%
DSMDX
Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.67%9.83%26.45%20.71%-31.46%17.96%74.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DREGX and DSMDX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.65

The correlation between DREGX and DSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DREGX vs. DSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DREGX
DREGX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DREGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DREGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DREGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DREGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DREGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DSMDX
DSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DREGX vs. DSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) and Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (DSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DREGXDSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.14

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.40

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

4.39

+3.12

DREGX vs. DSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DREGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the DSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DREGX and DSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DREGX vs. DSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DREGX drawdown since its inception was -65.44%, which is greater than DSMDX's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DREGX and DSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DREGXDSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.44%

-41.90%

-23.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-14.51%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-33.05%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.41%

-41.90%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.45%

-12.21%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-15.45%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

4.62%

-0.03%

Volatility

DREGX vs. DSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (DSMDX) at 7.22%. This indicates that DREGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DREGXDSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

7.22%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.31%

22.25%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.69%

27.35%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

26.23%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

26.17%

-7.04%

DREGX vs. DSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DREGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than DSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DREGX vs. DSMDX - Dividend Comparison

DREGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than DSMDX's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DREGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund
1.45%1.69%0.89%1.81%0.75%16.71%2.48%0.82%4.33%0.59%
DSMDX
Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.38%0.41%0.33%0.00%3.72%7.93%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DREGX and DSMDX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DREGX has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to DSMDX (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DREGX dropped -65.44% vs DSMDX's -41.90%.

DREGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DREGX and DSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer