DREGX vs. BEMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX).
DREGX is managed by Driehaus. It was launched on Dec 30, 1997. BEMIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 30, 2011.
Performance
DREGX vs. BEMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DREGX vs. BEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DREGX Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund | 0.87% | 29.95% | 7.40% | 11.26% | -22.54% | -1.95% | 27.36% | 25.34% | -16.26% | 42.52% |
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.96% | 47.83% | 4.01% | 22.53% | -15.91% | 1.68% | -6.17% | 18.60% | -15.56% | 26.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DREGX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than BEMIX's 2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DREGX has outperformed BEMIX with an annualized return of 8.89%, while BEMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.
DREGX
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
BEMIX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -11.64%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DREGX vs. BEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DREGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMIX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DREGX vs. BEMIX — Risk / Return Rank
DREGX
BEMIX
DREGX vs. BEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DREGX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 2.57 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 3.24 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.51 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.45 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 14.31 | -6.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DREGX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.57 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.61 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.24 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between DREGX and BEMIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DREGX vs. BEMIX - Dividend Comparison
DREGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than BEMIX's 2.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DREGX Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund | 1.68% | 1.69% | 0.89% | 1.81% | 0.75% | 16.71% | 2.48% | 0.82% | 4.33% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.09% | 2.15% | 3.04% | 2.45% | 2.86% | 2.31% | 1.31% | 2.56% | 1.55% | 1.41% | 2.20% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
DREGX vs. BEMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DREGX drawdown since its inception was -65.44%, which is greater than BEMIX's maximum drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DREGX and BEMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DREGX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.44% | -46.05% | -19.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.82% | -12.07% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.41% | -36.37% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.47% | -46.05% | +9.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.82% | -12.07% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.49% | -14.32% | -3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 2.91% | +0.77% |
Volatility
DREGX vs. BEMIX - Volatility Comparison
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) have volatilities of 8.78% and 8.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DREGX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 8.42% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.14% | 12.56% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 17.37% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 16.15% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 16.96% | +1.45% |