PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) and iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DRDR.L is traded in GBp, while BTEE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTEE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRDR.L achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than BTEE.L's 5.01% return.


DRDR.L

1D
3.48%
1M
6.16%
YTD
1.01%
6M
-0.48%
1Y
21.74%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
-0.91%
10Y*

BTEE.L

1D
3.30%
1M
2.09%
YTD
5.01%
6M
2.46%
1Y
42.82%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRDR.L
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.01%10.25%2.62%-2.51%-14.93%-5.21%48.69%8.88%-6.06%
BTEE.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.01%23.36%0.03%0.55%-1.41%0.37%23.80%20.78%-7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DRDR.L and BTEE.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

0.83

The correlation between DRDR.L and BTEE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRDR.L
BTEE.L

Healthcare

98.0%
100.0%

Technology

1.2%

-

Industrials

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

DRDR.L
98.0%
BTEE.L
100.0%

Technology

DRDR.L
1.2%
BTEE.L

-

Industrials

DRDR.L
0.4%
BTEE.L

-

Basic Materials

DRDR.L
0.4%
BTEE.L

-

Financial Services

DRDR.L
0.2%
BTEE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

DRDR.L
0.1%
BTEE.L

-

Communication Services

DRDR.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

DRDR.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Energy

DRDR.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Real Estate

DRDR.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Utilities

DRDR.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRDR.L
DRDR.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DRDR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRDR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRDR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DRDR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRDR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BTEE.L
BTEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BTEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) and iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRDR.LBTEE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

6.09

-4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

17.42

-13.06

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRDR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the BTEE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRDR.L and BTEE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRDR.LBTEE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.17

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.28

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.32

+0.02

Drawdowns

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRDR.L drawdown since its inception was -38.49%, which is greater than BTEE.L's maximum drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRDR.L and BTEE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRDR.LBTEE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.49%

-30.88%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-7.00%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.38%

-26.47%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

-30.88%

-4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.88%

-1.76%

-15.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-10.12%

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

2.45%

+2.53%

Volatility

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) is 4.79%, while iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that DRDR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRDR.LBTEE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

7.01%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

15.10%

-3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

19.60%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

20.72%

-3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.58%

22.42%

-3.84%

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRDR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEE.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRDR.L vs. BTEE.L - Dividend Comparison

DRDR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTEE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTEE.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.36%0.37%0.46%0.39%0.44%0.25%0.17%0.14%0.07%
DRDR.L
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRDR.L and BTEE.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTEE.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTEE.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DRDR.L.

DRDR.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while BTEE.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DRDR.L and 0.35% for BTEE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRDR.L and BTEE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer