PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRCVX vs. GABGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRCVX vs. GABGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) and Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRCVX achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than GABGX's 6.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DRCVX has underperformed GABGX with an annualized return of -4.13%, while GABGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.63% annualized return.


DRCVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
3.17%
6M
3.32%
1Y
9.66%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
-4.13%

GABGX

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.45%
YTD
6.28%
6M
5.73%
1Y
20.75%
3Y*
25.01%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
16.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRCVX vs. GABGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRCVX
Comstock Capital Value Fund
3.17%11.55%2.02%6.55%4.13%-2.16%-5.36%-25.76%7.76%-20.58%
GABGX
Gabelli Growth Fund
6.28%18.67%35.38%45.39%-39.04%22.48%39.11%34.19%1.89%29.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DRCVX and GABGX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 1987

-0.60

The correlation between DRCVX and GABGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.60 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRCVX vs. GABGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRCVX
DRCVX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DRCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DRCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GABGX
GABGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GABGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GABGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRCVX vs. GABGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) and Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRCVXGABGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.41

1.39

+2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.63

1.96

+3.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.24

+0.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.47

1.30

+10.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

41.31

4.46

+36.85

DRCVX vs. GABGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRCVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the GABGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRCVX and GABGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRCVXGABGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

1.39

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.53

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.42

0.74

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.55

-0.56

Drawdowns

DRCVX vs. GABGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRCVX drawdown since its inception was -97.47%, which is greater than GABGX's maximum drawdown of -66.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRCVX and GABGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRCVXGABGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.47%

-66.39%

-31.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

-16.53%

+15.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-22.39%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.08%

-42.36%

+38.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.27%

-42.36%

-11.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.61%

-0.72%

-95.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.89%

-16.69%

-49.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

4.79%

-4.54%

Volatility

DRCVX vs. GABGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) is 0.63%, while Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that DRCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRCVXGABGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

3.62%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

12.08%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

15.47%

-12.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.56%

23.45%

-18.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.80%

22.51%

-12.71%

DRCVX vs. GABGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRCVX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GABGX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRCVX vs. GABGX - Dividend Comparison

DRCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than GABGX's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRCVX
Comstock Capital Value Fund
1.90%1.96%0.00%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GABGX
Gabelli Growth Fund
5.16%5.49%6.27%1.66%0.00%5.03%7.02%11.48%5.66%6.28%5.17%8.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRCVX and GABGX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABGX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to DRCVX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRCVX dropped -97.47% vs GABGX's -66.39%.

DRCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRCVX and GABGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer