PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAI vs. MKAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAI vs. MKAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Draco Evolution AI ETF (DRAI) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRAI achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly higher than MKAM's 5.12% return.


DRAI

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.63%
YTD
18.51%
6M
16.55%
1Y
41.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MKAM

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.69%
YTD
5.12%
6M
5.30%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAI vs. MKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
18.51%33.68%-7.70%
MKAM
MKAM ETF
5.12%8.07%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAI and MKAM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

0.83

The correlation between DRAI and MKAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRAI vs. MKAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAI
MKAM

Technology

45.2%
35.6%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Financial Services

7.9%
11.8%

Healthcare

7.0%
8.5%

Industrials

6.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.9%

Energy

2.4%
3.5%

Utilities

1.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.9%

Technology

DRAI
45.2%
MKAM
35.6%

Communication Services

DRAI
10.9%
MKAM
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DRAI
10.1%
MKAM
10.1%

Financial Services

DRAI
7.9%
MKAM
11.8%

Healthcare

DRAI
7.0%
MKAM
8.5%

Industrials

DRAI
6.6%
MKAM
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

DRAI
5.3%
MKAM
4.9%

Energy

DRAI
2.4%
MKAM
3.5%

Utilities

DRAI
1.8%
MKAM
2.4%

Basic Materials

DRAI
1.7%
MKAM
1.8%

Real Estate

DRAI
1.3%
MKAM
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAI vs. MKAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAI
DRAI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DRAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DRAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MKAM
MKAM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAI vs. MKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Draco Evolution AI ETF (DRAI) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRAIMKAMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.95

2.36

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.91

3.29

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.45

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.84

3.87

+1.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.23

14.70

+1.53

DRAI vs. MKAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the MKAM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRAI and MKAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRAIMKAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

2.36

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

1.74

-0.41

Drawdowns

DRAI vs. MKAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAI drawdown since its inception was -13.69%, which is greater than MKAM's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAI and MKAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAIMKAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.69%

-5.01%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-3.72%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.36%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-1.13%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

0.98%

+1.61%

Volatility

DRAI vs. MKAM - Volatility Comparison

Draco Evolution AI ETF (DRAI) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to MKAM ETF (MKAM) at 1.48%. This indicates that DRAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAIMKAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

1.48%

+3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

4.51%

+5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

6.10%

+8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

6.22%

+10.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

6.22%

+10.53%

DRAI vs. MKAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAI has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MKAM's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAI vs. MKAM - Dividend Comparison

DRAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than MKAM's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
1.30%1.48%2.18%0.00%
MKAM
MKAM ETF
2.90%2.56%1.88%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRAI and MKAM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRAI has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to MKAM (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRAI dropped -13.69% vs MKAM's -5.01%.

On 1-year performance, DRAI leads with 41.96% vs 14.34% for MKAM. On fees, MKAM is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, MKAM has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DRAI has performed better with a 41.96% return vs 14.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MKAM is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DRAI.

MKAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.30% for DRAI.

They also come from different issuers: Draco Evolution and MKAM. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DRAI and 0.96% for MKAM.

DRAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAI and MKAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer