DRAG vs. CAS
DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) and CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) are both China Equities funds. Both are actively managed. DRAG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for CAS.
Performance
DRAG vs. CAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAS
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAG vs. CAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% |
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -1.66% |
DRAG vs. CAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRAG
CAS
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
DRAG
CAS
-
Communication Services
DRAG
CAS
-
Technology
DRAG
CAS
-
Basic Materials
DRAG
-
CAS
-
Consumer Defensive
DRAG
-
CAS
-
Energy
DRAG
-
CAS
-
Financial Services
DRAG
-
CAS
Healthcare
DRAG
-
CAS
-
Industrials
DRAG
-
CAS
-
Real Estate
DRAG
-
CAS
-
Utilities
DRAG
-
CAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAG vs. CAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRAG | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -3.61 | — |
Drawdowns
DRAG vs. CAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CAS drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAG and CAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAG | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -2.59% | +2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.66% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.72% | +1.72% |
Volatility
DRAG vs. CAS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAG | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 20.83% | -20.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 20.83% | -20.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 20.83% | -20.83% |
DRAG vs. CAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CAS's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAG vs. CAS - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRAG nor CAS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
DRAG and CAS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.88% for CAS.
Find the right allocation for DRAG and CAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer