PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAG vs. ASHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAG vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


DRAG vs. ASHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAG
ASHX

Consumer Cyclical

72.4%
7.1%

Communication Services

17.3%
1.5%

Technology

10.2%
14.1%

Basic Materials

-

9.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.3%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

19.6%

Healthcare

-

7.9%

Industrials

-

16.0%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Utilities

-

4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DRAG
72.4%
ASHX
7.1%

Communication Services

DRAG
17.3%
ASHX
1.5%

Technology

DRAG
10.2%
ASHX
14.1%

Basic Materials

DRAG

-

ASHX
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

DRAG

-

ASHX
14.3%

Energy

DRAG

-

ASHX
4.2%

Financial Services

DRAG

-

ASHX
19.6%

Healthcare

DRAG

-

ASHX
7.9%

Industrials

DRAG

-

ASHX
16.0%

Real Estate

DRAG

-

ASHX
1.4%

Utilities

DRAG

-

ASHX
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAG vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAG vs. ASHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRAG vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAGASHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

Volatility

DRAG vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAGASHXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

DRAG vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAG vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRAG nor ASHX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%2.38%1.76%0.84%0.80%1.78%1.07%2.48%19.46%2.91%
DRAG
Roundhill China Dragons ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASHX.

DRAG and ASHX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.60% for ASHX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAG and ASHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer