PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAG vs. AFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAG vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFTY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


DRAG vs. AFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAG
AFTY

Consumer Cyclical

72.4%

-

Communication Services

17.3%

-

Technology

10.2%
7.4%

Basic Materials

-

15.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.1%

Energy

-

11.5%

Financial Services

-

50.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

4.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DRAG
72.4%
AFTY

-

Communication Services

DRAG
17.3%
AFTY

-

Technology

DRAG
10.2%
AFTY
7.4%

Basic Materials

DRAG

-

AFTY
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

DRAG

-

AFTY
6.1%

Energy

DRAG

-

AFTY
11.5%

Financial Services

DRAG

-

AFTY
50.4%

Healthcare

DRAG

-

AFTY

-

Industrials

DRAG

-

AFTY
4.7%

Real Estate

DRAG

-

AFTY

-

Utilities

DRAG

-

AFTY
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAG vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAG vs. AFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRAG vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAGAFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

Volatility

DRAG vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAGAFTYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

DRAG vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAG vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRAG nor AFTY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%2.23%2.08%1.84%1.48%7.96%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%
DRAG
Roundhill China Dragons ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.

DRAG and AFTY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.70% for AFTY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAG and AFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer