DRAG vs. AFTY
DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) and AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) are both China Equities funds. DRAG is actively managed, while AFTY is passively managed. DRAG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AFTY.
Performance
DRAG vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAG vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% |
DRAG vs. AFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRAG
AFTY
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
DRAG
AFTY
-
Communication Services
DRAG
AFTY
-
Technology
DRAG
AFTY
Basic Materials
DRAG
-
AFTY
Consumer Defensive
DRAG
-
AFTY
Energy
DRAG
-
AFTY
Financial Services
DRAG
-
AFTY
Healthcare
DRAG
-
AFTY
-
Industrials
DRAG
-
AFTY
Real Estate
DRAG
-
AFTY
-
Utilities
DRAG
-
AFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAG vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAG vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAG | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
DRAG vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAG | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | — | — |
DRAG vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAG vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRAG nor AFTY has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.
DRAG and AFTY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.70% for AFTY.
Find the right allocation for DRAG and AFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer