DQEIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
DQEIX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Oct 17, 2007. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
DQEIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DQEIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DQEIX BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund | 1.02% | 24.64% | 6.54% | 9.70% | -3.72% | 14.32% | 5.62% | 25.80% | -5.61% | 18.18% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DQEIX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, DQEIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.43%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
DQEIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DQEIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DQEIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DQEIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
DQEIX
CSUAX
DQEIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DQEIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.63 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.17 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.36 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 10.32 | -4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DQEIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.63 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.61 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.55 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between DQEIX and CSUAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DQEIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
DQEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.95%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DQEIX BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund | 12.95% | 13.55% | 12.56% | 7.65% | 14.39% | 12.69% | 1.97% | 3.41% | 10.50% | 5.32% | 5.83% | 6.94% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
DQEIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DQEIX drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DQEIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DQEIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.75% | -52.20% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -7.98% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -20.45% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.69% | -35.05% | +2.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.39% | -4.38% | -5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -8.49% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.83% | +0.94% |
Volatility
DQEIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that DQEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DQEIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.26% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 6.89% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 11.48% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 12.89% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 14.89% | -0.31% |