PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPST vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPST vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPST achieves a 31.18% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.


DPST

1D
4.14%
1M
16.60%
YTD
31.18%
6M
20.48%
1Y
66.43%
3Y*
41.35%
5Y*
-20.53%
10Y*
-11.17%

CRMG

1D
4.23%
1M
-29.64%
YTD
-71.26%
6M
-71.01%
1Y
-73.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPST vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DPST and CRMG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPST vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPST
DPST Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPST Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPST vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DPSTCRMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.79

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

-0.97

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

-1.70

+5.36

DPST vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPST Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPST and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DPST vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPST drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPST and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPSTCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-79.83%

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.44%

-76.80%

+36.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.97%

-78.97%

-13.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.25%

-39.18%

-25.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.22%

43.41%

-25.19%

Volatility

DPST vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) is 18.76%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a volatility of 32.53%. This indicates that DPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPSTCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.76%

32.53%

-13.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.13%

63.74%

-15.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.32%

76.12%

-6.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.98%

75.39%

+13.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.46%

75.39%

+19.07%

DPST vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPST vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

DPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares
1.61%2.18%1.55%1.78%1.51%0.58%0.90%1.29%2.18%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


DPST and CRMG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRMG has higher volatility (32.53%) compared to DPST (18.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPST dropped -97.73% vs CRMG's -79.83%.

On 1-year performance, DPST leads with 66.43% vs -73.99% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DPST has been the lower-risk option at 18.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DPST has performed better with a 66.43% return vs -73.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DPST.

DPST has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DPST and 0.75% for CRMG.

DPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPST and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer