DPM.TO vs. C
DPM.TO (Dundee Precious Metals Inc.) and C (Citigroup Inc.) are both stocks. DPM.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while C operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, DPM.TO returned 31.40%/yr vs 17.22%/yr for C. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DPM.TO vs. C - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DPM.TO is traded in CAD, while C is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the C values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPM.TO achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than C's 23.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DPM.TO has outperformed C with an annualized return of 31.40%, while C has yielded a comparatively lower 17.22% annualized return.
DPM.TO
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 110.63%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 42.19%
- 10Y*
- 31.40%
C
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 14.21%
- YTD
- 23.48%
- 6M
- 28.12%
- 1Y
- 92.45%
- 3Y*
- 49.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 17.22%
DPM.TO vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPM.TO Dundee Precious Metals Inc. | 5.36% | 228.15% | 56.69% | 33.46% | -14.25% | -13.18% | 66.57% | 55.00% | 20.00% | 33.33% |
C Citigroup Inc. | 23.48% | 62.60% | 53.95% | 16.15% | -17.16% | 0.88% | -21.61% | 51.32% | -22.47% | 18.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPM.TO and C is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
DPM.TO:
CA$9.88B
C:
$248.34B
DPM.TO:
$2.55
C:
$8.65
DPM.TO:
12.50
C:
16.17
DPM.TO:
5.89
C:
1.51
DPM.TO:
2.61
C:
1.30
DPM.TO:
$1.07B
C:
$171.19B
DPM.TO:
$647.81M
C:
$77.85B
DPM.TO:
$688.93M
C:
$24.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPM.TO vs. C — Risk / Return Rank
DPM.TO
C
DPM.TO vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DPM.TO | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 5.78 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 17.51 | -7.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DPM.TO vs. C - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPM.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.18%, roughly equal to the maximum C drawdown of -97.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPM.TO and C.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPM.TO | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.18% | -97.79% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.44% | -15.12% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.44% | -31.83% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -38.55% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.96% | -51.83% | -0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.73% | -55.26% | +30.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.19% | -72.08% | +24.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.41% | 4.98% | +6.43% |
Volatility
DPM.TO vs. C - Volatility Comparison
Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.20% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 8.47%. This indicates that DPM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPM.TO | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.20% | 8.47% | +10.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.82% | 23.37% | +16.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.25% | 28.59% | +18.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.86% | 29.62% | +9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.33% | 33.61% | +13.72% |
Dividends
DPM.TO vs. C - Dividend Comparison
DPM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than C's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C Citigroup Inc. | 1.72% | 1.99% | 3.10% | 4.04% | 4.51% | 3.38% | 3.31% | 2.40% | 2.96% | 1.29% | 0.71% | 0.31% |
DPM.TO Dundee Precious Metals Inc. | 0.49% | 0.52% | 1.69% | 2.52% | 2.90% | 1.53% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DPM.TO vs. C - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dundee Precious Metals Inc. and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DPM.TO vs. C - Profitability Comparison
DPM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 223.10M and revenue of 310.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.
C - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
DPM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 183.99M and revenue of 310.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.3%.
C - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.
DPM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported a net income of 165.91M and revenue of 310.36M, resulting in a net margin of 53.5%.
C - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DPM.TO and C have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DPM.TO and C
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer