DPM.TO vs. BILS
DPM.TO (Dundee Precious Metals Inc.) is a stock, while BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 5 years, DPM.TO returned 43.35%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for BILS. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
DPM.TO vs. BILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DPM.TO is traded in CAD, while BILS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BILS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPM.TO achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 2.28% return.
DPM.TO
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 112.51%
- 3Y*
- 72.21%
- 5Y*
- 43.35%
- 10Y*
- 34.48%
BILS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- —
DPM.TO vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPM.TO Dundee Precious Metals Inc. | 8.50% | 228.58% | 56.68% | 33.46% | -13.25% | -12.83% | 2.74% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.28% | -0.55% | 14.20% | 2.61% | 8.09% | -0.98% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPM.TO and BILS is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPM.TO vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank
DPM.TO
BILS
DPM.TO vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DPM.TO | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 1.07 | +1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 1.48 | +1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 1.32 | +2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 3.66 | +7.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DPM.TO | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 1.07 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.97 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.56 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DPM.TO vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPM.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.16%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -10.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPM.TO and BILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPM.TO | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.16% | -10.11% | -84.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.52% | -3.73% | -25.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.52% | -5.22% | -24.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.88% | -5.22% | -36.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.49% | -0.06% | -22.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.60% | -2.82% | -38.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.62% | 1.34% | +9.28% |
Volatility
DPM.TO vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison
Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.43% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) at 0.74%. This indicates that DPM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPM.TO | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.43% | 0.74% | +13.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.24% | 3.46% | +33.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.44% | 4.63% | +40.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.47% | 6.34% | +32.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.25% | 6.33% | +40.92% |
Dividends
DPM.TO vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison
DPM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than BILS's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DPM.TO Dundee Precious Metals Inc. | 0.57% | 0.62% | 1.69% | 2.52% | 4.01% | 1.92% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DPM.TO and BILS have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DPM.TO and BILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer