PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPAY.L vs. KROG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DPAY.L is traded in USD, while KROG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the KROG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPAY.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than KROG.L's 13.99% return.


DPAY.L

1D
2.94%
1M
10.78%
6M
4.05%
YTD
2.53%
1Y
-5.75%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-5.68%
10Y*

KROG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.61%
6M
6.61%
YTD
13.99%
1Y
9.67%
3Y*
-1.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DPAY.L
L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.53%-7.05%14.10%20.99%-24.09%
KROG.L
Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
13.99%7.94%-8.44%-23.03%-23.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DPAY.L and KROG.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between DPAY.L and KROG.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPAY.L
DPAY.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DPAY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

KROG.L
KROG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
KROG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KROG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DPAY.LKROG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.11

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

0.90

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

1.86

-2.24

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPAY.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the KROG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPAY.L and KROG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPAY.L drawdown since its inception was -50.59%, roughly equal to the maximum KROG.L drawdown of -53.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPAY.L and KROG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPAY.LKROG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.59%

-53.14%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.54%

-10.76%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-29.25%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.35%

-38.17%

+9.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-36.99%

+5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.23%

5.20%

+10.03%

Volatility

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) at 3.96%. This indicates that DPAY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPAY.LKROG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

3.96%

+4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.54%

13.03%

+6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.66%

16.42%

+7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.18%

21.10%

+5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

21.10%

+4.78%

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPAY.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than KROG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPAY.L vs. KROG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DPAY.L nor KROG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DPAY.L and KROG.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DPAY.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DPAY.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROG.L.

DPAY.L tracks Solactive Digital Payments Index NTR, while KROG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DPAY.L and 0.50% for KROG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPAY.L and KROG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer