PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DON vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DON vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF (DON) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DON achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than QVAL's 14.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DON has underperformed QVAL with an annualized return of 9.16%, while QVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.


DON

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.47%
YTD
7.24%
6M
6.89%
1Y
14.24%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
9.16%

QVAL

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.27%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DON vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DON
WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF
7.24%3.86%14.20%14.04%-4.72%30.29%-5.40%23.31%-8.26%14.86%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.68%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DON and QVAL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.87

The correlation between DON and QVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DON vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DON
QVAL

Financial Services

21.1%

-

Industrials

17.1%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
32.4%

Real Estate

9.3%
2.0%

Energy

7.9%
5.5%

Utilities

6.9%

-

Basic Materials

6.4%
7.6%

Technology

4.5%
16.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
7.9%

Healthcare

2.4%
11.1%

Financial Services

DON
21.1%
QVAL

-

Industrials

DON
17.1%
QVAL
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DON
11.5%
QVAL
32.4%

Real Estate

DON
9.3%
QVAL
2.0%

Energy

DON
7.9%
QVAL
5.5%

Utilities

DON
6.9%
QVAL

-

Basic Materials

DON
6.4%
QVAL
7.6%

Technology

DON
4.5%
QVAL
16.7%

Communication Services

DON
3.9%
QVAL
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

DON
3.6%
QVAL
7.9%

Healthcare

DON
2.4%
QVAL
11.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DON vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DON
DON Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DON Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DON Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DON Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DON Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DON vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF (DON) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DONQVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

4.93

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

13.98

-9.05

DON vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DON Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the QVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DON and QVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DONQVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.07

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.56

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.51

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.49

-0.07

Drawdowns

DON vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DON drawdown since its inception was -61.94%, which is greater than QVAL's maximum drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DON and QVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DONQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.94%

-51.49%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-6.04%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-21.41%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-27.17%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

-51.49%

+4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-0.78%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-7.80%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.13%

+0.77%

Volatility

DON vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF (DON) is 3.06%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that DON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DONQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

4.16%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

10.06%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.97%

14.44%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

21.63%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

22.79%

-2.53%

DON vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DON has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DON vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

DON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than QVAL's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DON
WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF
2.36%2.53%2.27%2.41%2.71%2.12%2.77%2.38%2.55%2.25%2.48%2.89%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DON and QVAL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to DON (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DON dropped -61.94% vs QVAL's -51.49%.

On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.64% vs 9.16% for DON. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DON has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DON.

DON has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.46% for QVAL.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DON and 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DON and QVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer