DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO
DOL.TO (Dollarama Inc.) and FTS.TO (Fortis Inc.) are both stocks. DOL.TO operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while FTS.TO operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, DOL.TO returned 20.60%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for FTS.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOL.TO achieves a -6.81% return, which is significantly lower than FTS.TO's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, DOL.TO has outperformed FTS.TO with an annualized return of 20.60%, while FTS.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.
DOL.TO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- -6.81%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- -1.21%
- 3Y*
- 31.52%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.60%
FTS.TO
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOL.TO Dollarama Inc. | -6.81% | 46.59% | 47.34% | 20.96% | 25.45% | 22.47% | 16.69% | 38.01% | -37.58% | 61.41% |
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. | 13.43% | 23.93% | 14.24% | 4.76% | -7.87% | 21.81% | 0.04% | 22.71% | 2.74% | 15.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOL.TO and FTS.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2009 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
DOL.TO:
CA$52.20B
FTS.TO:
CA$40.48B
DOL.TO:
CA$4.86
FTS.TO:
CA$3.56
DOL.TO:
39.32
FTS.TO:
22.34
DOL.TO:
1.83
FTS.TO:
3.25
DOL.TO:
6.94
FTS.TO:
3.30
DOL.TO:
38.10
FTS.TO:
1.78
DOL.TO:
CA$7.58B
FTS.TO:
CA$12.21B
DOL.TO:
CA$3.09B
FTS.TO:
CA$3.98B
DOL.TO:
CA$2.23B
FTS.TO:
CA$5.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DOL.TO
FTS.TO
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dollarama Inc. (DOL.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOL.TO | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.36 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 4.33 | -4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 10.47 | -10.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOL.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, which is greater than FTS.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOL.TO and FTS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOL.TO | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.98% | -28.27% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.07% | -6.09% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -10.97% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.07% | -24.01% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.98% | -28.27% | -16.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | 0.00% | -7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -5.71% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.61% | 2.51% | +6.10% |
Volatility
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dollarama Inc. (DOL.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) at 4.96%. This indicates that DOL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOL.TO | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.02% | 4.96% | +6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.17% | 10.44% | +9.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 13.12% | +9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 14.45% | +7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 16.86% | +7.53% |
Dividends
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison
DOL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than FTS.TO's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOL.TO Dollarama Inc. | 0.23% | 0.20% | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.39% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.19% | 1.31% |
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. | 3.18% | 3.48% | 3.99% | 4.19% | 4.01% | 3.36% | 3.73% | 3.39% | 3.79% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.73% |
Financials
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dollarama Inc. and Fortis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DOL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Profitability Comparison
DOL.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported a gross profit of 686.75M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.
FTS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a gross profit of 933.00M and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
DOL.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported an operating income of 382.72M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
FTS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported an operating income of 933.00M and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
DOL.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported a net income of 302.27M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
FTS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a net income of 523.00M and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DOL.TO and FTS.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DOL.TO and FTS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer