PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOGG vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOGG vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOGG achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 101.34% return.


DOGG

1D
1.16%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
7.19%
6M
6.77%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
-4.73%
1M
8.37%
YTD
101.34%
6M
101.99%
1Y
203.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOGG vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
7.19%19.43%-2.58%9.25%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
101.34%53.93%-17.00%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DOGG and AMDY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.07

The correlation between DOGG and AMDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOGG vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOGG vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DOGGAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

7.44

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

16.58

-11.73

DOGG vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOGG and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DOGG vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOGGAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-53.92%

+42.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-27.59%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.78%

-4.73%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-17.78%

+14.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

12.35%

-8.64%

Volatility

DOGG vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) is 4.04%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 21.35%. This indicates that DOGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOGGAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

21.35%

-17.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

43.63%

-35.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

56.19%

-45.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

46.93%

-33.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.97%

46.93%

-33.96%

DOGG vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

DOGG vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, less than AMDY's 65.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
65.88%80.68%109.98%6.68%
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.72%8.75%9.92%5.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOGG and AMDY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (21.35%) compared to DOGG (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOGG dropped -11.19% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 203.83% vs 18.00% for DOGG. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 203.83% return vs 18.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 65.88%, compared with 8.72% for DOGG.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DOGG and 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOGG and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer