DOG vs. QQQD
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%) while QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DOG returned -12.72% vs -21.80% for QQQD. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
DOG vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's -2.89% return.
DOG
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- -12.72%
- 3Y*
- -8.28%
- 5Y*
- -5.31%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
QQQD
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -2.89%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -21.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.15% | -8.40% | -4.10% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -2.89% | -20.32% | -27.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and QQQD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between DOG and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
QQQD
DOG vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOG | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | -1.08 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | -1.55 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.83 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.82 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.23 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOG | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | -1.08 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.86 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
DOG vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.69%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.69% | -49.47% | -43.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -26.65% | +12.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.61% | -47.50% | -45.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.39% | -30.34% | -36.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.89% | 17.72% | -8.83% |
Volatility
DOG vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 2.98%, while Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 4.76% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 14.43% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 20.21% | -8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 26.77% | -11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 26.77% | -9.28% |
DOG vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOG vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than QQQD's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.49% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 4.07% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and QQQD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQD has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to DOG (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.69% vs QQQD's -49.47%.
On 1-year performance, DOG leads with -12.72% vs -21.80% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DOG has performed better with a -12.72% return vs -21.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DOG.
QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 3.49% for DOG.
DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 0.57% for QQQD.
DOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer