DOG vs. ORCS
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and ORCS (Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. DOG is passively managed, while ORCS is actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ORCS.
Performance
DOG vs. ORCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -6.96% return, which is significantly lower than ORCS's 25.50% return.
DOG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -6.96%
- 1Y
- -12.16%
- 3Y*
- -8.78%
- 5Y*
- -5.73%
- 10Y*
- -11.05%
ORCS
- 1D
- 6.26%
- 1M
- 37.01%
- 6M
- 32.40%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG vs. ORCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -6.96% | -3.65% |
ORCS Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF | 25.50% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and ORCS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. ORCS — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
ORCS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOG vs. ORCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOG | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOG vs. ORCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.90%, which is greater than ORCS's maximum drawdown of -50.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and ORCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.90% | -50.25% | -42.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.82% | -10.21% | -82.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -16.41% | -50.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.99% | — | — |
Volatility
DOG vs. ORCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.36% | 59.82% | -47.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 59.82% | -44.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 59.82% | -42.35% |
DOG vs. ORCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ORCS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOG vs. ORCS - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than ORCS's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.39% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
ORCS Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF | 1.14% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and ORCS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ORCS.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.14% for ORCS.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 0.97% for ORCS.
Find the right allocation for DOG and ORCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer