DOG vs. FIAT
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and FIAT (YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while FIAT is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. DOG is passively managed, while FIAT is actively managed. Over the past year, DOG returned -12.72% vs -7.95% for FIAT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FIAT.
Performance
DOG vs. FIAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than FIAT's 9.13% return.
DOG
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- -12.72%
- 3Y*
- -8.28%
- 5Y*
- -5.31%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
FIAT
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 22.96%
- 1Y
- -7.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG vs. FIAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.15% | -8.40% | -4.09% |
FIAT YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 9.13% | -24.17% | -28.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and FIAT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. FIAT — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
FIAT
DOG vs. FIAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOG | FIAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | -0.14 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | 0.17 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.02 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.18 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -0.28 | -1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOG | FIAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | -0.14 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.40 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
DOG vs. FIAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.69%, which is greater than FIAT's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and FIAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | FIAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.69% | -70.50% | -22.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -42.26% | +27.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.61% | -52.97% | -39.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.39% | -45.34% | -21.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.89% | 27.30% | -18.41% |
Volatility
DOG vs. FIAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 2.98%, while YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) has a volatility of 16.00%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | FIAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 16.00% | -13.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 42.07% | -32.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 55.32% | -43.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 60.54% | -45.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 60.54% | -43.05% |
DOG vs. FIAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FIAT's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOG vs. FIAT - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than FIAT's 97.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.49% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
FIAT YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 97.31% | 178.11% | 70.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and FIAT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIAT has higher volatility (16.00%) compared to DOG (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.69% vs FIAT's -70.50%.
On 1-year performance, FIAT leads with -7.95% vs -12.72% for DOG. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FIAT has performed better with a -7.95% return vs -12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FIAT.
FIAT has the higher dividend yield at 97.31%, compared with 3.49% for DOG.
DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FIAT is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 0.99% for FIAT.
FIAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and FIAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer