PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAUG vs. BUFQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAUG vs. BUFQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAUG achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than BUFQ's 9.40% return.


DAUG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.65%
YTD
5.31%
6M
5.28%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*

BUFQ

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.56%
YTD
9.40%
6M
9.25%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAUG vs. BUFQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DAUG
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August
5.31%11.75%12.00%13.85%-3.77%
BUFQ
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
9.40%14.03%16.41%35.51%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DAUG and BUFQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022

0.86

The correlation between DAUG and BUFQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAUG vs. BUFQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAUG
DAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFQ
BUFQ Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAUG vs. BUFQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DAUGBUFQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.52

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

4.01

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.14

20.08

-1.94

DAUG vs. BUFQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the BUFQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAUG and BUFQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DAUG vs. BUFQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, roughly equal to the maximum BUFQ drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAUG and BUFQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAUGBUFQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-15.74%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.37%

-5.39%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.53%

-15.74%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.20%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-2.29%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.08%

-0.25%

Volatility

DAUG vs. BUFQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) is 1.31%, while FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that DAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAUGBUFQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

2.22%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

6.66%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.60%

8.35%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.07%

13.30%

-5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

13.30%

-4.05%

DAUG vs. BUFQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFQ's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAUG vs. BUFQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAUG nor BUFQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DAUG and BUFQ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFQ has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to DAUG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAUG dropped -15.34% vs BUFQ's -15.74%.

On 3-year performance, BUFQ leads with 16.52% vs 11.98% for DAUG. On fees, DAUG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BUFQ has performed better with a 16.52% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAUG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BUFQ.

DAUG and BUFQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BUFQ is Nasdaq-100. DAUG tracks S&P 500, while BUFQ tracks NASDAQ 100 Index - USD. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DAUG and 1.10% for BUFQ.

DAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAUG and BUFQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer