DNNG vs. BLSG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DNNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF) and BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. DNNG is passively managed, while BLSG is actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

DNNG vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF (DNNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DNNG

• 1D: -6.12%
• 1M: -9.26%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLSG

• 1D: -11.67%
• 1M: -58.73%
• YTD: -72.84%
• 6M: -78.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNNG vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DNNG Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF	-48.80%
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	-58.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DNNG and BLSG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	0.34

Return for Risk

DNNG vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF (DNNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

DNNG vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNNG drawdown since its inception was -65.39%, smaller than the maximum BLSG drawdown of -89.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNNG and BLSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNNG	BLSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.39%	-89.13%	+23.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.29%	-89.13%	+31.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.10%	-61.96%	+27.86%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DNNG	BLSG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	118.09%	146.21%	-28.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.09%	146.21%	-28.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	118.09%	146.21%	-28.12%

DNNG vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DNNG and BLSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

DNNG vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNNG nor BLSG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNNG and BLSG in my portfolio?

DNNG and BLSG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DNNG or BLSG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DNNG or BLSG?

DNNG and BLSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DNNG or BLSG?

DNNG and BLSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.