DNLDX vs. FSMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX).
DNLDX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Jan 29, 1985. FSMDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
DNLDX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DNLDX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | -1.64% | 9.79% | 22.27% | 16.99% | -14.34% | 26.49% | 9.29% | 16.82% | -14.46% | 16.64% |
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | -1.30% | 10.58% | 15.55% | 17.20% | -17.27% | 22.56% | 17.13% | 30.53% | -9.38% | 18.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNLDX achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLDX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 8.68%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return.
DNLDX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- -1.64%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 14.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
FSMDX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 13.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DNLDX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DNLDX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
DNLDX
FSMDX
DNLDX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNLDX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.72 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.87 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 4.07 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNLDX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.72 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.65 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between DNLDX and FSMDX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DNLDX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison
DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.27%, more than FSMDX's 1.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 15.27% | 14.15% | 15.24% | 1.69% | 8.82% | 17.74% | 2.77% | 2.65% | 11.14% | 11.32% | 1.00% | 3.12% |
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | 1.12% | 1.10% | 2.46% | 1.39% | 2.07% | 3.35% | 2.34% | 2.86% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.23% | 2.84% |
Drawdowns
DNLDX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and FSMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNLDX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -40.35% | -23.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.37% | -13.42% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.42% | -26.07% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.23% | -40.35% | -1.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | -8.16% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -5.00% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.86% | -0.12% |
Volatility
DNLDX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) is 4.43%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that DNLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DNLDX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.74% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 10.17% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 18.96% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 18.23% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 19.28% | +0.21% |