PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNLDX vs. DTGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNLDX vs. DTGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNLDX achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than DTGRX's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLDX has underperformed DTGRX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while DTGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.37% annualized return.


DNLDX

1D
-1.25%
1M
2.69%
YTD
12.26%
6M
10.41%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
10.51%

DTGRX

1D
-5.30%
1M
6.70%
YTD
28.52%
6M
27.16%
1Y
48.92%
3Y*
35.76%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
23.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNLDX vs. DTGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
12.26%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%
DTGRX
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund
28.52%27.20%30.78%59.98%-46.44%12.62%69.80%52.82%-1.47%42.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DNLDX and DTGRX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 1997

0.80

The correlation between DNLDX and DTGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNLDX vs. DTGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DTGRX
DTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNLDX vs. DTGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNLDXDTGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.07

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

10.85

+0.10

DNLDX vs. DTGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the DTGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNLDX and DTGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNLDX vs. DTGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum DTGRX drawdown of -83.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and DTGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLDXDTGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-83.23%

+19.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-17.27%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.42%

-28.31%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-52.92%

+29.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

-52.92%

+10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-5.30%

+4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-38.67%

+29.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

4.87%

-2.92%

Volatility

DNLDX vs. DTGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) is 4.67%, while BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that DNLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLDXDTGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

14.40%

-9.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

21.25%

-11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

25.30%

-11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

29.18%

-10.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

28.24%

-8.73%

DNLDX vs. DTGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DTGRX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNLDX vs. DTGRX - Dividend Comparison

DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.38%, more than DTGRX's 9.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.38%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%
DTGRX
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund
9.37%12.04%8.98%0.00%0.00%21.32%5.76%34.25%30.17%9.91%10.19%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNLDX and DTGRX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTGRX has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to DNLDX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLDX dropped -63.69% vs DTGRX's -83.23%.

DTGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNLDX and DTGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer