DNLDX vs. DAGVX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX).
DNLDX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Jan 29, 1985. DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995.
Performance
DNLDX vs. DAGVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DNLDX vs. DAGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 0.70% | 9.79% | 22.27% | 16.99% | -14.34% | 26.49% | 9.29% | 16.82% | -14.46% | 16.64% |
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 2.23% | 18.20% | 14.16% | 12.54% | 1.43% | 30.90% | 3.66% | 26.74% | -10.76% | 14.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNLDX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than DAGVX's 2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLDX has underperformed DAGVX with an annualized return of 8.93%, while DAGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
DNLDX
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.93%
DAGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DNLDX vs. DAGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DAGVX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DNLDX vs. DAGVX — Risk / Return Rank
DNLDX
DAGVX
DNLDX vs. DAGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNLDX | DAGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.06 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.52 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.54 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | 6.79 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNLDX | DAGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.06 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.80 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.68 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between DNLDX and DAGVX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DNLDX vs. DAGVX - Dividend Comparison
DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.92%, more than DAGVX's 6.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 14.92% | 14.15% | 15.24% | 1.69% | 8.82% | 17.74% | 2.77% | 2.65% | 11.14% | 11.32% | 1.00% | 3.12% |
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 6.54% | 6.69% | 6.85% | 5.09% | 7.96% | 21.64% | 2.64% | 3.29% | 17.81% | 10.71% | 2.72% | 15.78% |
Drawdowns
DNLDX vs. DAGVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than DAGVX's maximum drawdown of -55.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and DAGVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNLDX | DAGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -55.04% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.37% | -12.23% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.42% | -16.96% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.23% | -42.62% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -4.66% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -7.69% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.77% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DNLDX vs. DAGVX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) at 4.71%. This indicates that DNLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DNLDX | DAGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.71% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 9.12% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.99% | 16.89% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 15.58% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 18.82% | +0.68% |