PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNAVX vs. JAAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNAVX vs. JAAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNAVX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than JAAAX's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DNAVX has underperformed JAAAX with an annualized return of 3.51%, while JAAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.20% annualized return.


DNAVX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.35%
6M
-0.96%
YTD
0.62%
1Y
0.88%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
3.51%
ALL TIME*
2.58%

JAAAX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.14%
6M
4.35%
YTD
6.67%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
4.20%
ALL TIME*
5.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DNAVX vs. JAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNAVX
Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund
0.62%5.12%6.13%18.70%-14.02%9.29%1.63%13.99%-8.44%8.09%
JAAAX
John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund
6.67%6.18%6.59%5.85%-3.12%4.77%4.36%8.95%-4.09%6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DNAVX and JAAAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2010

0.67

The correlation between DNAVX and JAAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNAVX vs. JAAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DNAVX
DNAVX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DNAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DNAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

JAAAX
JAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
JAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DNAVX vs. JAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNAVXJAAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.62

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

5.42

-5.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

19.58

-18.76

DNAVX vs. JAAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNAVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the JAAAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNAVX and JAAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNAVX vs. JAAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNAVX drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than JAAAX's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNAVX and JAAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNAVXJAAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-15.72%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-2.02%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.05%

-5.66%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-6.28%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.73%

-12.64%

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

0.00%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-2.03%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.56%

+0.90%

Volatility

DNAVX vs. JAAAX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) at 0.97%. This indicates that DNAVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNAVXJAAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

0.97%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

2.57%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

3.49%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.62%

4.21%

+4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

4.37%

+4.04%

DNAVX vs. JAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNAVX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAAX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNAVX vs. JAAAX - Dividend Comparison

DNAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.49%, more than JAAAX's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNAVX
Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund
11.49%11.56%0.00%3.41%0.00%0.00%0.75%0.00%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JAAAX
John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund
1.43%1.53%1.17%1.71%3.02%1.72%0.74%3.38%1.99%1.23%0.77%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNAVX and JAAAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNAVX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to JAAAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNAVX dropped -17.73% vs JAAAX's -15.72%.

JAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNAVX and JAAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer