DMO vs. FFRHX
DMO (Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - DMO is a Global Allocation fund managed by Dimensional, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, DMO returned 3.76%/yr vs 4.81%/yr for FFRHX. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DMO charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.
Performance
DMO vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMO achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DMO has underperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 3.76%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.81% annualized return.
DMO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.28%
FFRHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $399.37K | $416.73K | $406.81K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DMO vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMO Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund | 1.66% | 6.95% | 20.24% | 16.79% | -21.64% | 17.12% | -22.32% | 9.10% | -2.04% | 23.46% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 2.14% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 5.01% | 1.69% | 8.63% | 0.10% | 3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMO and FFRHX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2010 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMO vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank
DMO
FFRHX
DMO vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund (DMO) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DMO | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.77 | -0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 4.16 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 13.76 | -13.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DMO vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMO drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMO and FFRHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMO | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.16% | -22.20% | -26.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -1.19% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.04% | -3.29% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.04% | -5.90% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.16% | -22.20% | -26.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -0.11% | -4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -1.14% | -8.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 0.36% | +3.24% |
Volatility
DMO vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund (DMO) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.20%. This indicates that DMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMO | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 0.20% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 1.66% | +6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06% | 2.26% | +7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 2.89% | +9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 4.13% | +15.79% |
DMO vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMO vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison
DMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.22%, more than FFRHX's 6.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMO Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund | 14.22% | 14.01% | 12.92% | 11.46% | 11.51% | 8.88% | 10.95% | 9.63% | 18.93% | 13.30% | 13.19% | 14.09% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.39% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMO and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DMO has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to FFRHX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMO dropped -49.16% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.
FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMO and FFRHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer