PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMO vs. DMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMO vs. DMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund (DMO) and Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMO achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than DMB's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DMO has outperformed DMB with an annualized return of 4.44%, while DMB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.


DMO

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
3.87%
6M
0.45%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
4.44%

DMB

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.76%
YTD
1.64%
6M
7.11%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
-1.64%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMO vs. DMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMO
Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund
3.87%6.95%20.24%16.79%-21.64%17.12%-22.32%9.10%-2.04%23.46%
DMB
Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund
1.64%10.69%3.87%2.42%-23.23%7.04%0.75%28.84%-3.89%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DMO and DMB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMO vs. DMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMO
DMO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

DMB
DMB Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMO vs. DMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund (DMO) and Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMODMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

1.63

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

2.46

-1.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.78

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.90

6.45

-4.54

DMO vs. DMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the DMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMO and DMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMODMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

1.63

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

-0.11

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.15

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.17

+0.32

Drawdowns

DMO vs. DMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMO drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than DMB's maximum drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMO and DMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMODMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.16%

-40.15%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

-8.00%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.04%

-22.06%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.04%

-40.15%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.16%

-40.15%

-9.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-19.30%

+16.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-14.29%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.21%

+1.02%

Volatility

DMO vs. DMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund (DMO) is 2.40%, while Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that DMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMODMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

3.37%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

7.19%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

9.06%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.79%

14.67%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

15.20%

+4.76%

DMO vs. DMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than DMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DMO vs. DMB - Dividend Comparison

DMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.79%, more than DMB's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMB
Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund
4.49%3.93%3.48%4.46%5.80%4.42%4.54%4.36%5.36%4.89%5.97%6.06%
DMO
Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund
13.79%14.01%12.92%11.46%11.51%8.88%10.95%9.63%18.93%13.30%13.19%14.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMO and DMB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMB has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to DMO (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMO dropped -49.16% vs DMB's -40.15%.

DMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMO and DMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer