DMCRX vs. WISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX).
DMCRX is managed by Driehaus. It was launched on Nov 18, 2013. WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013.
Performance
DMCRX vs. WISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DMCRX vs. WISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 2.25% | 31.17% | 30.58% | 11.47% | -33.54% | 22.23% | 86.43% | 34.03% | 2.52% | 24.35% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.94% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | 3.03% | 26.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMCRX achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than WISGX's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, DMCRX has outperformed WISGX with an annualized return of 20.60%, while WISGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.10% annualized return.
DMCRX
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 20.60%
WISGX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMCRX vs. WISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMCRX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than WISGX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DMCRX vs. WISGX — Risk / Return Rank
DMCRX
WISGX
DMCRX vs. WISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMCRX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 0.94 | +1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 1.44 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.19 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 1.52 | +2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.46 | 5.85 | +6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMCRX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 0.94 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.06 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.55 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.44 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between DMCRX and WISGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DMCRX vs. WISGX - Dividend Comparison
DMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.42%, while WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 13.42% | 13.72% | 3.86% | 0.87% | 8.20% | 48.23% | 19.79% | 14.70% | 33.22% | 8.91% | 0.00% | 4.20% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
DMCRX vs. WISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMCRX drawdown since its inception was -59.16%, which is greater than WISGX's maximum drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMCRX and WISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMCRX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.16% | -43.22% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.46% | -14.26% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.16% | -43.22% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.16% | -43.22% | -15.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.79% | -8.74% | -2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.35% | -12.69% | -7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 3.69% | +0.93% |
Volatility
DMCRX vs. WISGX - Volatility Comparison
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) at 9.23%. This indicates that DMCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DMCRX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | 9.23% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.15% | 15.49% | +7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.42% | 24.34% | +7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.55% | 24.44% | +15.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 23.93% | +9.95% |