PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMCRX vs. DMAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMCRX vs. DMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMCRX achieves a 29.20% return, which is significantly higher than DMAGX's 21.30% return.


DMCRX

1D
1.67%
1M
5.02%
YTD
29.20%
6M
25.97%
1Y
81.98%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
23.16%

DMAGX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.79%
YTD
21.30%
6M
20.23%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
26.99%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMCRX vs. DMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
29.20%31.17%30.58%11.47%-33.54%22.23%86.43%34.03%2.52%24.64%
DMAGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
21.30%22.77%26.16%19.48%-18.85%-1.84%30.20%21.64%-13.22%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DMCRX and DMAGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2017

0.64

The correlation between DMCRX and DMAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMCRX vs. DMAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMCRX
DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAGX
DMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMCRX vs. DMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMCRXDMAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

3.77

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.89

15.02

+3.87

DMCRX vs. DMAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMCRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the DMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMCRX and DMAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMCRX vs. DMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMCRX drawdown since its inception was -46.68%, which is greater than DMAGX's maximum drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMCRX and DMAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMCRXDMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.68%

-34.21%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.46%

-10.18%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.92%

-18.03%

-16.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.68%

-31.38%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-9.77%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

2.55%

+1.89%

Volatility

DMCRX vs. DMAGX - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) at 6.39%. This indicates that DMCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMCRXDMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

6.39%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.58%

13.44%

+9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.71%

16.02%

+13.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.65%

15.39%

+13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.05%

15.56%

+12.49%

DMCRX vs. DMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMCRX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMCRX vs. DMAGX - Dividend Comparison

DMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, less than DMAGX's 11.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMAGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
11.54%13.99%8.34%1.45%2.08%4.57%2.34%1.15%0.84%4.91%0.00%0.00%
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
10.62%13.72%3.86%0.87%8.20%48.23%19.79%14.70%33.22%8.91%0.00%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMCRX and DMAGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMCRX has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to DMAGX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMCRX dropped -46.68% vs DMAGX's -34.21%.

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMCRX and DMAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer