PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMBS vs. CGCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMBS vs. CGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMBS achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than CGCB's 0.05% return.


DMBS

1D
0.09%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.96%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
10Y*

CGCB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.01%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMBS vs. CGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
0.71%8.54%2.09%6.34%
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
0.05%7.29%1.44%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DMBS and CGCB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023

0.91

The correlation between DMBS and CGCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMBS vs. CGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCB
CGCB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMBS vs. CGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMBSCGCBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.29

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

1.92

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.71

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.60

5.16

+2.44

DMBS vs. CGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the CGCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMBS and CGCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMBSCGCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.29

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.08

-0.45

Drawdowns

DMBS vs. CGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMBS drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, which is greater than CGCB's maximum drawdown of -5.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMBS and CGCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMBSCGCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-5.17%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-2.98%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-1.83%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-1.34%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.98%

-0.08%

Volatility

DMBS vs. CGCB - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) at 1.32%. This indicates that DMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMBSCGCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

1.32%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

2.80%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

3.94%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

5.39%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

5.39%

+0.89%

DMBS vs. CGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCB's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMBS vs. CGCB - Dividend Comparison

DMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than CGCB's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
4.22%4.22%3.99%0.95%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
5.11%4.96%4.97%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DMBS and CGCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to CGCB (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMBS dropped -8.14% vs CGCB's -5.17%.

On 1-year performance, DMBS leads with 7.09% vs 5.06% for CGCB. On fees, CGCB is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, CGCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGCB is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.22% for CGCB.

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DMBS and 0.27% for CGCB.

DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMBS and CGCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer