DMB vs. DMA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA).

DMB is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It was launched on Jan 1, 2013. DMA is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It was launched on Mar 16, 2012.

Performance

DMB vs. DMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DMB vs. DMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DMB Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund	-2.99%	10.69%	3.87%	2.42%	-22.53%
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	-5.96%	16.89%	41.06%	-3.81%	-15.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMB achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly higher than DMA's -5.96% return.

DMB

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -4.76%
• YTD: -2.99%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 4.25%
• 3Y*: 0.82%
• 5Y*: -1.75%
• 10Y*: 2.41%

DMA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: -5.96%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 8.74%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMB vs. DMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DMB and DMA have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DMB

Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund

DMA

Dimensional Managed Account Fund

Return for Risk

DMB vs. DMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMB

DMB Risk / Return Rank: 14
DMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
DMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
DMB Omega Ratio Rank: 13
DMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
DMB Martin Ratio Rank: 14

DMA

DMA Risk / Return Rank: 20
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 21
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMB vs. DMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMB	DMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	0.49	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	0.88	-0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.13	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	0.61	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.31	2.39	-1.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMB vs. DMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the DMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMB and DMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMB	DMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	0.49	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.23	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between DMB and DMA is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DMB vs. DMA - Dividend Comparison

DMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than DMA's 13.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMB Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund	4.44%	3.93%	3.48%	4.46%	5.80%	4.42%	4.54%	4.36%	5.36%	4.89%	5.97%	6.06%
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	13.69%	9.42%	3.83%	5.22%	10.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DMB vs. DMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMB drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, roughly equal to the maximum DMA drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMB and DMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMB	DMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.15%	-38.85%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-12.71%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.98%	-7.64%	-15.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-11.26%	-2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.70%	3.38%	+0.32%

Volatility

DMB vs. DMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) is 3.71%, while Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that DMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMB	DMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	5.19%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.39%	8.94%	-2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.06%	17.78%	-7.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	24.34%	-9.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	24.34%	-9.18%