PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMB vs. DMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMB vs. DMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMB achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than DMA's -8.61% return.


DMB

1D
-0.46%
1M
1.86%
YTD
1.17%
6M
5.51%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
-1.82%
10Y*
2.15%

DMA

1D
1.73%
1M
3.08%
YTD
-8.61%
6M
-4.92%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMB vs. DMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DMB
Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund
1.17%10.69%3.87%2.42%-22.53%
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
-8.61%16.89%41.06%-3.81%-15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DMB and DMA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2022

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMB vs. DMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMB
DMB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DMA
DMA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMB vs. DMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMBDMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.03

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

0.07

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

0.21

+6.43

DMB vs. DMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the DMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMB and DMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMBDMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.09

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.19

-0.03

Drawdowns

DMB vs. DMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMB drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, roughly equal to the maximum DMA drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMB and DMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMBDMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-38.85%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-18.34%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-18.34%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.67%

-10.24%

-9.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-11.31%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

5.98%

-3.77%

Volatility

DMB vs. DMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) is 3.35%, while Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that DMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMBDMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

7.04%

-3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

12.55%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

14.03%

-4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

24.30%

-9.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

24.30%

-9.10%

DMB vs. DMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DMB and DMA have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DMB vs. DMA - Dividend Comparison

DMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than DMA's 15.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
15.56%9.42%3.83%5.22%10.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DMB
Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund
4.51%3.93%3.48%4.46%5.80%4.42%4.54%4.36%5.36%4.89%5.97%6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMB and DMA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMA has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to DMB (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMB dropped -40.15% vs DMA's -38.85%.

DMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMB and DMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer