PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAY vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAY vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.


DMAY

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.30%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.19%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.85%
YTD
28.91%
6M
29.60%
1Y
51.55%
3Y*
26.27%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAY vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
4.42%11.05%12.82%15.40%-9.98%6.14%6.40%
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
28.91%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%61.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAY and GRID is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.75

The correlation between DMAY and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

DMAY vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMAY
GRID

Technology

36.2%
11.0%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
3.5%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%
65.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%
20.4%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.0%

Technology

DMAY
36.2%
GRID
11.0%

Financial Services

DMAY
11.9%
GRID

-

Communication Services

DMAY
10.9%
GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

DMAY
10.1%
GRID
3.5%

Healthcare

DMAY
8.4%
GRID

-

Industrials

DMAY
8.1%
GRID
65.2%

Consumer Defensive

DMAY
4.9%
GRID

-

Energy

DMAY
3.5%
GRID

-

Utilities

DMAY
2.3%
GRID
20.4%

Real Estate

DMAY
1.9%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

DMAY
1.8%
GRID
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAY vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAY vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMAYGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.45

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

4.42

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.76

16.72

+6.04

DMAY vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAY and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMAYGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.67

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.85

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.57

+0.30

Drawdowns

DMAY vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAYGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-40.56%

+26.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-11.73%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

-20.77%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

-29.64%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-1.33%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-8.43%

+6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

3.09%

-2.54%

Volatility

DMAY vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) is 0.84%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that DMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMAYGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

7.95%

-7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

16.08%

-12.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

19.39%

-14.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

21.00%

-11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

22.81%

-14.38%

DMAY vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAY vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMAY and GRID have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 17.84% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

DMAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while GRID tracks NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAY and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer