DMAX vs. NVDO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DMAX is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DMAX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

DMAX vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAX achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 21.85% return.

DMAX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 3.14%
• 1Y: 8.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDO

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 16.94%
• YTD: 21.85%
• 6M: 31.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAX vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF	2.42%	3.14%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	21.85%	11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAX and NVDO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

DMAX vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAX

DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 95
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAX vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMAX	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.74	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.80	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.15	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	31.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMAX	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.16	1.45	+0.71

Drawdowns

DMAX vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAX drawdown since its inception was -3.37%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAX and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMAX	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-16.25%	+12.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.23%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.38%	-5.00%	+4.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DMAX	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33%	31.88%	-29.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.40%	31.88%	-28.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.40%	31.88%	-28.48%

DMAX vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMAX vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than NVDO's 13.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF	1.15%	1.18%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	13.67%	16.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMAX and NVDO in my portfolio?

DMAX and NVDO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DMAX or NVDO?

On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DMAX or NVDO?

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DMAX or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.67%, compared with 1.15% for DMAX.

What is the main difference between DMAX and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DMAX and 0.77% for NVDO.