PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAX vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DMAX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DMAX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 1.60% return.


DMAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
1.70%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.03%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
1.60%
6M
3.88%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DMAX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DMAX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMAXDGRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.14

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

1.66

+1.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.25

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

1.48

+2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.00

6.80

+12.20

DMAX vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAX and DGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMAXDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.14

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.73

+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between DMAX and DGRO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DMAX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than DGRO's 2.10% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF
1.18%1.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
2.10%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Drawdowns

DMAX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAX drawdown since its inception was -3.37%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAX and DGRO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAXDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-35.10%

+31.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

-10.92%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-4.70%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-3.48%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

2.37%

-1.96%

Volatility

DMAX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) is 0.99%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that DMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DMAXDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

3.57%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

7.21%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

14.47%

-11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

13.84%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

16.63%

-13.07%