DMAT vs. BOTZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ).
DMAT and BOTZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DMAT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Disruptive Materials Index. It was launched on Jan 24, 2022. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. Both DMAT and BOTZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DMAT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DMAT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAT Global X Disruptive Materials ETF | 7.58% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -16.33% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | -7.81% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -28.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAT achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -7.81% return.
DMAT
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 21.61%
- 1Y
- 105.25%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMAT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DMAT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
DMAT
BOTZ
DMAT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMAT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.67 | 0.59 | +2.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 1.05 | +1.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.13 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 0.90 | +3.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.81 | 3.20 | +11.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMAT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 0.59 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.37 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAT and BOTZ is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DMAT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
DMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than BOTZ's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAT Global X Disruptive Materials ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
Drawdowns
DMAT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAT drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, roughly equal to the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAT and BOTZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -55.54% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -19.34% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.51% | -15.78% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -18.55% | -11.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.05% | 5.46% | +1.59% |
Volatility
DMAT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 8.79%. This indicates that DMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DMAT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.74% | 8.79% | +5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.26% | 17.78% | +14.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.60% | 27.83% | +11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 26.52% | +7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 25.68% | +8.19% |