PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAT vs. EART
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DMAT vs. EART - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DMAT vs. EART - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DMAT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
7.58%98.48%-7.19%-19.75%-16.33%
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
7.58%98.48%-7.19%-19.75%-16.33%

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with DMAT at 7.58% and EART at 7.58%.


DMAT

1D
-1.06%
1M
-10.07%
YTD
7.58%
6M
21.61%
1Y
105.25%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
10Y*

EART

1D
-1.06%
1M
-10.07%
YTD
7.58%
6M
21.61%
1Y
105.25%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DMAT vs. EART - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DMAT and EART have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Return for Risk

DMAT vs. EART — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAT
DMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EART
EART Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EART Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAT vs. EART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMATEARTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

2.67

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

2.94

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

4.01

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.81

14.81

0.00

DMAT vs. EART - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the EART Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAT and EART, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMATEARTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.67

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.21

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between DMAT and EART is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DMAT vs. EART - Dividend Comparison

DMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, which matches EART's 0.60% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
DMAT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
0.60%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
0.60%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%

Drawdowns

DMAT vs. EART - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAT drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, roughly equal to the maximum EART drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAT and EART.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DMATEARTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.68%

-53.68%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.03%

-26.03%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.51%

-18.51%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.87%

-29.87%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.05%

7.05%

0.00%

Volatility

DMAT vs. EART - Volatility Comparison

Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) have volatilities of 14.74% and 14.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DMATEARTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

14.74%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.26%

32.26%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.60%

39.60%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.87%

33.87%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.87%

33.87%

0.00%