DMAGX vs. EMPTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DMAGX (Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund) and EMPTX (UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, DMAGX returned 10.65%/yr vs 6.59%/yr for EMPTX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DMAGX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EMPTX.

Performance

DMAGX vs. EMPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAGX achieves a 19.21% return, which is significantly lower than EMPTX's 30.51% return.

DMAGX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 6.58%
• YTD: 19.21%
• 6M: 19.43%
• 1Y: 36.53%
• 3Y*: 26.63%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: —

EMPTX

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 10.37%
• YTD: 30.51%
• 6M: 34.39%
• 1Y: 68.31%
• 3Y*: 26.97%
• 5Y*: 6.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAGX vs. EMPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DMAGX Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	19.21%	22.77%	26.16%	19.48%	-18.85%	-1.84%	30.20%	21.64%	-11.69%
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	30.51%	43.82%	2.51%	8.92%	-25.38%	-9.36%	24.79%	14.98%	0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAGX and EMPTX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between DMAGX and EMPTX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

DMAGX vs. EMPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAGX

DMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 73
DMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
DMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

EMPTX

EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 94
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAGX vs. EMPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMAGX	EMPTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	4.00	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	4.80	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.71	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	5.17	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.88	20.43	-5.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMAGX vs. EMPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is lower than the EMPTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAGX and EMPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMAGX	EMPTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	4.00	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.35	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.49	+0.32

Drawdowns

DMAGX vs. EMPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAGX drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, smaller than the maximum EMPTX drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAGX and EMPTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMAGX	EMPTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.21%	-46.03%	+11.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.18%	-14.50%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.03%	-15.50%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.38%	-41.46%	+10.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.82%	-18.37%	+8.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	3.54%	-1.05%

Volatility

DMAGX vs. EMPTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) is 4.96%, while UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that DMAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMAGX	EMPTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.96%	7.75%	-2.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.22%	16.12%	-3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	18.72%	-3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	19.28%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	19.37%	-3.89%

DMAGX vs. EMPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EMPTX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMAGX vs. EMPTX - Dividend Comparison

DMAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.74%, more than EMPTX's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DMAGX Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	11.74%	13.99%	8.34%	1.45%	2.08%	4.57%	2.34%	1.15%	0.84%	4.91%
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	1.47%	1.91%	3.40%	3.20%	3.84%	11.93%	1.50%	2.75%	0.54%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMAGX and EMPTX in my portfolio?

DMAGX and EMPTX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMAGX or EMPTX?

EMPTX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to DMAGX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAGX dropped -34.21% vs EMPTX's -46.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.