DMA vs. AAAAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX).

DMA is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It was launched on Mar 16, 2012. AAAAX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 30, 2007.

Performance

DMA vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DMA vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	-5.96%	16.89%	41.06%	-3.81%	-15.90%
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A	8.59%	12.82%	5.24%	2.30%	-9.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMA achieves a -5.96% return, which is significantly lower than AAAAX's 8.59% return.

DMA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: -5.96%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 8.74%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAAX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 16.80%
• 3Y*: 9.80%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: 7.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMA vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

AAAAX

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A

DMA

Dimensional Managed Account Fund

Return for Risk

DMA vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMA

DMA Risk / Return Rank: 20
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 21
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

AAAAX

AAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 81
AAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMA vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMA	AAAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	1.49	-0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	2.00	-1.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.30	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	1.80	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.39	9.69	-7.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMA vs. AAAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the AAAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMA and AAAAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMA	AAAAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	1.49	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.38	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between DMA and AAAAX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DMA vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison

DMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.69%, more than AAAAX's 3.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	13.69%	9.42%	3.83%	5.22%	10.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A	3.26%	3.54%	2.45%	2.08%	4.17%	2.31%	1.33%	1.81%	1.61%	1.52%	1.47%	2.15%

Drawdowns

DMA vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMA drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, roughly equal to the maximum AAAAX drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMA and AAAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMA	AAAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.85%	-40.47%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.71%	-9.55%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.62%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.64%	-4.57%	-3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-6.89%	-4.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	1.77%	+1.61%

Volatility

DMA vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that DMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMA	AAAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	3.03%	+2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	7.22%	+1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.78%	11.60%	+6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.34%	12.18%	+12.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.34%	12.66%	+11.68%