DLTNX vs. DBCMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DLTNX (DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N) and DBCMX (DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund) are both mutual funds - DLTNX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DBCMX is a Commodities fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 10 years, DLTNX returned 1.47%/yr vs 6.39%/yr for DBCMX. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. DLTNX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for DBCMX.

Performance

DLTNX vs. DBCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLTNX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than DBCMX's 20.78% return. Over the past 10 years, DLTNX has underperformed DBCMX with an annualized return of 1.47%, while DBCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.39% annualized return.

DLTNX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: -0.02%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: 4.16%
• 5Y*: 0.29%
• 10Y*: 1.47%

DBCMX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: 20.78%
• 6M: 21.71%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: 9.70%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: 6.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLTNX vs. DBCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DLTNX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N	-0.21%	7.66%	2.94%	4.96%	-12.77%	-0.01%	3.87%	5.74%	1.50%	3.44%
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund	20.78%	6.10%	0.45%	-3.96%	13.40%	31.24%	-6.07%	4.78%	-10.65%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DLTNX and DBCMX is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	-0.13

The correlation between DLTNX and DBCMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DLTNX vs. DBCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLTNX

DLTNX Risk / Return Rank: 16
DLTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
DLTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
DLTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
DLTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
DLTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

DBCMX

DBCMX Risk / Return Rank: 46
DBCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DBCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
DBCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
DBCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DBCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLTNX vs. DBCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLTNX	DBCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.77	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.42	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.31	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	2.49	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	11.34	-7.73

DLTNX vs. DBCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLTNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the DBCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLTNX and DBCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DLTNX vs. DBCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLTNX drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum DBCMX drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLTNX and DBCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLTNX	DBCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.94%	-37.62%	+20.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.21%	-9.92%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.65%	-14.75%	+8.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.94%	-27.60%	+10.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.94%	-37.62%	+20.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-9.92%	+7.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.54%	-13.23%	+10.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	2.20%	-1.07%

Volatility

DLTNX vs. DBCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) is 1.30%, while DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that DLTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLTNX	DBCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	3.96%	-2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.84%	12.48%	-9.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	14.01%	-10.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.54%	16.28%	-10.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.38%	14.64%	-10.26%

DLTNX vs. DBCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLTNX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBCMX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLTNX vs. DBCMX - Dividend Comparison

DLTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than DBCMX's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund	2.51%	3.04%	2.89%	3.30%	46.88%	13.53%	0.00%	1.04%	1.21%	5.23%	0.51%	0.00%
DLTNX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N	4.64%	4.62%	4.77%	4.11%	3.59%	2.87%	3.13%	3.49%	3.48%	3.40%	3.47%	3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLTNX and DBCMX in my portfolio?

DLTNX and DBCMX have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLTNX or DBCMX?

DBCMX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to DLTNX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLTNX dropped -16.94% vs DBCMX's -37.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.