PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLS vs. FDTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLS vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than FDTS's 16.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DLS has underperformed FDTS with an annualized return of 7.46%, while FDTS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.


DLS

1D
-0.94%
1M
0.80%
YTD
6.63%
6M
9.37%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
7.46%

FDTS

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
16.64%
6M
19.06%
1Y
45.71%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLS vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
6.63%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
16.64%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DLS and FDTS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012

0.57

Over the past year, DLS and FDTS have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

DLS vs. FDTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLS
FDTS

Industrials

27.8%
23.0%

Financial Services

13.3%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
18.4%

Basic Materials

8.9%
11.2%

Technology

8.4%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
5.0%

Real Estate

7.8%
4.3%

Communication Services

4.4%
3.0%

Healthcare

3.7%
3.0%

Energy

3.0%
4.3%

Utilities

2.1%
2.7%

Industrials

DLS
27.8%
FDTS
23.0%

Financial Services

DLS
13.3%
FDTS
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DLS
12.8%
FDTS
18.4%

Basic Materials

DLS
8.9%
FDTS
11.2%

Technology

DLS
8.4%
FDTS
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

DLS
7.9%
FDTS
5.0%

Real Estate

DLS
7.8%
FDTS
4.3%

Communication Services

DLS
4.4%
FDTS
3.0%

Healthcare

DLS
3.7%
FDTS
3.0%

Energy

DLS
3.0%
FDTS
4.3%

Utilities

DLS
2.1%
FDTS
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLS vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLS vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLSFDTSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

2.69

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

3.52

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.64

-1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.55

13.32

-5.77

DLS vs. FDTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the FDTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLS and FDTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLSFDTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.69

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.36

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.37

-0.04

Drawdowns

DLS vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than FDTS's maximum drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and FDTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLSFDTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.13%

-51.26%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-12.61%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-13.19%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-33.11%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.77%

-51.26%

+6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-6.49%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-10.65%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.44%

-0.45%

Volatility

DLS vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) is 4.58%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that DLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLSFDTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

6.54%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

14.09%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

17.05%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

29.28%

-13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

24.85%

-8.18%

DLS vs. FDTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLS vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison

DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than FDTS's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
3.50%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLS and FDTS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to DLS (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs FDTS's -51.26%.

On 10-year performance, FDTS leads with 10.50% vs 7.46% for DLS. On fees, DLS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.58% for FDTS.

DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLS and FDTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer