PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLS vs. DIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLS vs. DIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) and WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than DIM's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DLS has underperformed DIM with an annualized return of 7.86%, while DIM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.54% annualized return.


DLS

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.24%
6M
3.30%
YTD
8.42%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
6.44%

DIM

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.21%
6M
6.09%
YTD
11.14%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
8.54%
ALL TIME*
6.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$172.44K$195.57K$301.47K
$1.54M$1.48M$1.54M

DLS vs. DIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund
8.42%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%
DIM
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund
11.14%37.25%3.51%15.00%-14.09%9.55%-0.40%19.85%-15.32%28.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DLS and DIM is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

0.93

The correlation between DLS and DIM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DLS vs. DIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLS
DIM

Industrials

28.0%
22.2%

Financial Services

13.8%
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
8.3%

Technology

9.1%
4.3%

Basic Materials

9.0%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.3%

Real Estate

7.4%
7.3%

Communication Services

4.2%
5.1%

Healthcare

3.6%
3.7%

Energy

2.4%
4.6%

Utilities

2.0%
7.1%

Industrials

DLS
28.0%
DIM
22.2%

Financial Services

DLS
13.8%
DIM
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DLS
12.9%
DIM
8.3%

Technology

DLS
9.1%
DIM
4.3%

Basic Materials

DLS
9.0%
DIM
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

DLS
7.7%
DIM
6.3%

Real Estate

DLS
7.4%
DIM
7.3%

Communication Services

DLS
4.2%
DIM
5.1%

Healthcare

DLS
3.6%
DIM
3.7%

Energy

DLS
2.4%
DIM
4.6%

Utilities

DLS
2.0%
DIM
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLS vs. DIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

DIM
DIM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLS vs. DIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) and WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLSDIMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.08

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

7.56

-1.85

DLS vs. DIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the DIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLS and DIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLS vs. DIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, roughly equal to the maximum DIM drawdown of -61.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and DIM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLSDIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.13%

-61.45%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-10.56%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-12.13%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-30.71%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.77%

-40.89%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.43%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-12.55%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.91%

+0.35%

Volatility

DLS vs. DIM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) at 3.95%. This indicates that DLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLSDIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.95%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

11.40%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

13.51%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

15.47%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

16.53%

-0.15%

DLS vs. DIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DLS and DIM have an expense ratio of 0.58%.


Dividends

DLS vs. DIM - Dividend Comparison

DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than DIM's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIM
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund
2.98%3.20%3.58%4.62%3.96%3.65%2.53%3.26%3.28%2.57%2.94%2.81%
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.51%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DLS and DIM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DLS has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DIM (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs DIM's -61.45%.

On 10-year performance, DIM leads with 8.54% vs 7.86% for DLS. Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. On volatility, DIM has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIM has performed better with a 8.54% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLS and DIM have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.98% for DIM.

DLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DIM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while DIM tracks WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index.

DIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLS and DIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer