PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLS vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLS vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, DLS has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 7.46%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.


DLS

1D
-0.94%
1M
0.80%
YTD
6.63%
6M
9.37%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
7.46%

DGRW

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLS vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
6.63%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund
9.10%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DLS and DGRW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.72

The correlation between DLS and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

DLS vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLS
DGRW

Industrials

27.8%
9.9%

Financial Services

13.3%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
7.1%

Basic Materials

8.9%
3.3%

Technology

8.4%
32.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
6.7%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Communication Services

4.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

3.7%
12.8%

Energy

3.0%
5.0%

Utilities

2.1%
0.2%

Industrials

DLS
27.8%
DGRW
9.9%

Financial Services

DLS
13.3%
DGRW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DLS
12.8%
DGRW
7.1%

Basic Materials

DLS
8.9%
DGRW
3.3%

Technology

DLS
8.4%
DGRW
32.1%

Consumer Defensive

DLS
7.9%
DGRW
6.7%

Real Estate

DLS
7.8%
DGRW

-

Communication Services

DLS
4.4%
DGRW
10.1%

Healthcare

DLS
3.7%
DGRW
12.8%

Energy

DLS
3.0%
DGRW
5.0%

Utilities

DLS
2.1%
DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLS vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLS vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLSDGRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

2.12

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

3.09

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.52

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.55

11.03

-3.48

DLS vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLS and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLSDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.12

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.88

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.88

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.86

-0.52

Drawdowns

DLS vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLSDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.13%

-32.04%

-31.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-8.30%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-16.21%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-17.27%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.77%

-32.04%

-12.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-0.83%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-3.01%

-10.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.89%

+1.10%

Volatility

DLS vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.47%. This indicates that DLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLSDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

2.47%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

7.64%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

9.88%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

13.97%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

16.21%

+0.46%

DLS vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLS vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than DGRW's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund
1.27%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
3.50%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLS and DGRW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.15% vs 7.46% for DLS. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 1.27% for DGRW.

DLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLS and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer