PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLR vs. KMLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLR vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLR achieves a 23.50% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 12.95% return.


DLR

1D
-2.42%
1M
8.78%
6M
15.14%
YTD
23.50%
1Y
12.63%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
9.76%
ALL TIME*
18.05%

KMLM

1D
0.24%
1M
6.85%
6M
12.90%
YTD
12.95%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
0.08%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$649.02M$598.96M$548.08M
$14.29M$9.53M$7.83M

DLR vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DLR
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
23.50%-10.07%35.90%39.95%-41.00%30.66%4.14%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
12.95%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DLR and KMLM is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020

-0.18

The correlation between DLR and KMLM shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (5 years) to -0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLR vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLR
DLR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLR vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLRKMLMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.28

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

1.86

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.36

6.03

-4.67

DLR vs. KMLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLR and KMLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLR vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLR drawdown since its inception was -56.80%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLR and KMLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLRKMLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.80%

-27.47%

-29.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.83%

-9.61%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

-22.28%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.52%

-27.47%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.93%

-11.93%

+5.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-12.79%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.45%

2.95%

+4.50%

Volatility

DLR vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 3.70%. This indicates that DLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLRKMLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.89%

3.70%

+9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.76%

10.31%

+10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.82%

11.49%

+15.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.27%

14.53%

+14.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.49%

14.66%

+13.83%

Dividends

DLR vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

DLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than KMLM's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLR
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
2.59%3.15%2.75%3.63%4.87%2.62%3.21%3.61%3.79%3.27%3.58%4.50%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.45%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLR and KMLM have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLR has higher volatility (12.89%) compared to KMLM (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLR dropped -56.80% vs KMLM's -27.47%.

KMLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLR and KMLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer