PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLN vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLN vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLN achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DLN has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 12.68%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.


DLN

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%

ILCG

1D
-1.02%
1M
7.68%
YTD
14.48%
6M
14.61%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLN vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
9.93%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
14.48%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%38.56%33.22%2.06%30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DLN and ILCG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between DLN and ILCG has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DLN vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLN
ILCG

Technology

20.1%
49.8%

Financial Services

18.0%
6.0%

Healthcare

12.6%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
1.6%

Energy

8.5%
0.5%

Industrials

7.9%
8.3%

Communication Services

7.8%
14.5%

Utilities

5.9%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
10.6%

Real Estate

4.0%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.1%

Technology

DLN
20.1%
ILCG
49.8%

Financial Services

DLN
18.0%
ILCG
6.0%

Healthcare

DLN
12.6%
ILCG
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

DLN
9.3%
ILCG
1.6%

Energy

DLN
8.5%
ILCG
0.5%

Industrials

DLN
7.9%
ILCG
8.3%

Communication Services

DLN
7.8%
ILCG
14.5%

Utilities

DLN
5.9%
ILCG
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DLN
5.0%
ILCG
10.6%

Real Estate

DLN
4.0%
ILCG
1.4%

Basic Materials

DLN
1.0%
ILCG
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLN vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLN vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLNILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

1.89

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.59

6.68

+8.91

DLN vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLN and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLNILCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.82

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.68

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.59

-0.06

Drawdowns

DLN vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLN drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than ILCG's maximum drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLN and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLNILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.84%

-52.98%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-15.65%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.71%

-23.10%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.26%

-35.38%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

-35.38%

-0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-1.02%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-8.22%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

4.43%

-2.99%

Volatility

DLN vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) is 2.17%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that DLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLNILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

4.40%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

12.81%

-6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.87%

16.31%

-7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

22.00%

-8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

21.53%

-5.37%

DLN vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLN has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLN vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

DLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than ILCG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.40%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLN and ILCG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLN dropped -57.84% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 18.15% vs 12.68% for DLN. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.

DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DLN and 0.04% for ILCG.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLN and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer